The Big Picture - Latest comments

In response to: SOCIAL BODIES and NATURAL ORDER

Clara [Visitor] — Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:05:00 +0000

Excellent post. Thank you.

In response to: SCIENCE AND BELIEF SYSTEMS I

Dandy [Visitor] — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:00:40 +0000

wow

In response to: The need for drastic radical revolutionary change

Cleo [Visitor] — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:13:08 +0000

thank you

In response to: ATTRACTION/REPULSION

in2it [Member] — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 04:24:11 +0000

I don't think force in and of itself can exist. As in a one way force. I think there needs to be resistence involved. In another post i discuss the fact that everything is energy. We don't know what energy is, but only its effects. So, energy, whatever it is, is fundamental to everything. And in order to be energy it must be energetic and the only way i can see that it could be energetic is by being attracted to and repelled by itself at the same time. And this a/r dynamic manifests itself throughout the universe.

In response to: ATTRACTION/REPULSION

RAMU [Visitor] — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:59:26 +0000

Contemplating on the fundamental principle of all, I realized last night that force is the fundamental principle. You are force, I am force and anything between us is force. From the sub-atomic levels to intra-cellular levels of living organisms and all their functions, including their thoughts and desires, and at all ‘macro’ levels, including galaxy levels, only force is present and active.
The only quality of force is to exert (and thereby constantly influence or change or transform). (Nishkarma does not seem possible and ‘unchangeability’ also seems not possible!)
Hunger is exertion of force, pain is exertion of force and pleasure is exertion of force. The all pervading principle is just force. There is nothing but force.
I wonder whether when force causes repulsion, the particles and waves (which are themselves just sources and recipients of force) are simply assumed to be of same charges and when it causes attraction, they are simply assumed to be of opposite charges. Are charges real?
But ‘charges’ are also force. It all seems to be force (s?) acting on each other (meaning acting on itself) creating the myth of time (which is movement in space) and space. Time and space being analogous, there is only space. Space seems nothing but (field of) force.
Even though force seems to have dual behavior (attraction and repulsion), my intuition tells me that the duality of force is a myth though apparently particles and (?) waves (particles and waves themselves defined as sources of force and recipients of force) are moved away from each other or towards each other by the force they exert on each other, in addition to ‘environmental’ force, depending on the net force.
I would appreciate help in understanding the duality (?) (or multiplicity) of force. Is duality or multiplicity a fundamental truth (behavior) of force? What is the real nature of force?
S Ramu
peacebliss@gmail.com

In response to: ATTRACTION/REPULSION

Carole [Visitor] — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:55:13 +0000

Very attractive piece. Bravo!

In response to: ATTRACTION/REPULSION

in2it [Member] — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:56:09 +0000

thank you jr for your interest - info will be sent to you via email - tj

In response to: SOCIAL BODIES and NATURAL ORDER

in2it [Member] — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:06:35 +0000

Thanks for your comment Rob Z - and yes i think it presents an opportunity to get beyond ideological hang ups and start trying to find how best to utilize, what are now seen to be, opposing viewpoints. For instance we should be able to ascertain how best to utilize conservative and liberal approaches to things i.e., be conservative about the things that work and seek appropriate change for the things that don't instead of installing across the board conservatism or liberalism according to the swing of the pendulum. Such a prospect would require changing the whole configuration of our social systems which at present encourage ideological contentiousness to the extreme.
tj